A. Allan Schmid was one of the main founders and thinkers in the Spartan School of Institutional Economics. He took a balanced and pluralistic view of the value and importance of the various approaches and methodologies. One of the key questions is the relationship between institutional economics and neoclassical (or so called orthodox) economics. Schmid, as we will see, took a very balanced and nuanced view of this relationship. This view helps set the stage for a more general exploration of institutional economics.
His writing illustrates his nuanced view of these issues. Schmid writes that "orthodox economics misses many issues of power" and "neoclassical economics has focused narrowly on that part of psychology that can be captured in the concepts of utility and preferences" (Schmid, pg. 3 and 4). At the same time, Schmid is complimentary of some of the important advances in neoclassical and welfare economics, he writes that, "welfare economics provides a number of useful concepts applicable to broad political economy and policy analysis" (Schmid, pg. 4).
Schmid's concept was to use the approaches that have been built by neoclassical and welfare economics. His words express these ideas in the best way, "welfare economists have identified a number of product characteristics that create problems in identifying efficient welfare improving allocative changes". "Those will be utilized and added to, but not for the purpose of defining barriers to optimization". Thus, we see that Schmid had a great respect for the work that had gone in orthodox economics but at the same time also felt that there was need to refine and reshape how that thinking had proceeded.
His writing illustrates his nuanced view of these issues. Schmid writes that "orthodox economics misses many issues of power" and "neoclassical economics has focused narrowly on that part of psychology that can be captured in the concepts of utility and preferences" (Schmid, pg. 3 and 4). At the same time, Schmid is complimentary of some of the important advances in neoclassical and welfare economics, he writes that, "welfare economics provides a number of useful concepts applicable to broad political economy and policy analysis" (Schmid, pg. 4).
Schmid's concept was to use the approaches that have been built by neoclassical and welfare economics. His words express these ideas in the best way, "welfare economists have identified a number of product characteristics that create problems in identifying efficient welfare improving allocative changes". "Those will be utilized and added to, but not for the purpose of defining barriers to optimization". Thus, we see that Schmid had a great respect for the work that had gone in orthodox economics but at the same time also felt that there was need to refine and reshape how that thinking had proceeded.
Comments
Post a Comment